Hi
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. September 2023 um 10:03 Uhr
> Von: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Il 11/09/23 20:33, Frank Wunderlich ha scritto:
> > From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The upcoming mt7988 has different temperature coefficients so we
> > cannot use constants in the functions lvts_golden_temp_init,
> > lvts_golden_temp_init and lvts_raw_to_temp anymore.
> >
> > Add a field in the lvts_ctrl pointing to the lvts_data which now
> > contains the soc-specific temperature coefficents.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
> > index effd9b00a424..c1004b4da3b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
> > @@ -80,8 +80,8 @@
> > #define LVTS_SENSOR_MAX 4
> > #define LVTS_GOLDEN_TEMP_MAX 62
> > #define LVTS_GOLDEN_TEMP_DEFAULT 50
> > -#define LVTS_COEFF_A -250460
> > -#define LVTS_COEFF_B 250460
> > +#define LVTS_COEFF_A_MT8195 -250460
> > +#define LVTS_COEFF_B_MT8195 250460
> >
> > #define LVTS_MSR_IMMEDIATE_MODE 0
> > #define LVTS_MSR_FILTERED_MODE 1
> > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
> > #define LVTS_MINIMUM_THRESHOLD 20000
> >
> > static int golden_temp = LVTS_GOLDEN_TEMP_DEFAULT;
> > -static int coeff_b = LVTS_COEFF_B;
> > +static int coeff_b;
>
> This could be renamed to `golden_temp_offset`
>
> >
> > struct lvts_sensor_data {
> > int dt_id;
> > @@ -109,9 +109,15 @@ struct lvts_ctrl_data {
> > int mode;
> > };
> >
> > +struct formula_coeff {
> > + int a;
> > + int b;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct lvts_data {
> > const struct lvts_ctrl_data *lvts_ctrl;
> > int num_lvts_ctrl;
> > + struct formula_coeff coeff;
>
> You can just add the coefficients here directly... and while at it you can
> also make it self explanatory, because the "A" coefficient is a factor while
> the "B" coefficient is just an offset.
>
> int temp_factor; <--- coeff_a
> int temp_offset; <--- coeff_b
makes sense...imho very good idea.
originally i took the naming based on the Constants which maybe should be changed too?
> > };
> >
> > struct lvts_sensor {
> > @@ -126,6 +132,7 @@ struct lvts_sensor {
> >
> > struct lvts_ctrl {
> > struct lvts_sensor sensors[LVTS_SENSOR_MAX];
> > + const struct lvts_data *lvts_data;
> > u32 calibration[LVTS_SENSOR_MAX];
> > u32 hw_tshut_raw_temp;
> > int num_lvts_sensor;
> > @@ -247,21 +254,21 @@ static void lvts_debugfs_exit(struct lvts_domain *lvts_td) { }
> >
> > #endif
> >
> > -static int lvts_raw_to_temp(u32 raw_temp)
> > +static int lvts_raw_to_temp(u32 raw_temp, struct formula_coeff coeff)
> > {
> > int temperature;
> >
> > - temperature = ((s64)(raw_temp & 0xFFFF) * LVTS_COEFF_A) >> 14;
> > + temperature = ((s64)(raw_temp & 0xFFFF) * coeff.a) >> 14;
>
> so that this also becomes more readable:
>
> static int lvts_raw_to_temp(u32 raw_temp, int temp_factor)
> {
> int temperature;
>
> temperature = ((s64)(raw_temp & 0xFFFF) * temp_factor) >> 14;
> temperature += golden_temp_offset;
>
> return temperature;
> }
>
> where temp_factor is lvts_data.temp_factor, and golden_temp_offset is a
> rename of `static int coeff_b`.
right and passing an int (instead of struct) is easier and more readable too.
> Cheers,
> Angelo
>
>
