On 13/09/2023 12:48, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 13.09.2023 10:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 13/09/2023 10:47, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> On 13.09.2023 09:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 12/09/2023 15:31, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>>> These clocks are now handled from within the icc framework and are >>>> >>>> That's a driver behavior, not hardware. >>> I believe we've been over this already.. >>> >>> The rationale behind this change is: that hardware, which falls >>> under the "interconnect" class, was previously misrepresented as >>> a bunch of clocks. There are clocks underneath, but accessing them >>> directly would be equivalent to e.g. circumventing the PHY subsystem >>> and initializing your UFS PHY from within the UFS device. >> >> And every time one write such commit msg, how should we remember there >> is some exception and actually it is about clock representation not CCF >> or ICC framework. > So is your reply essentially "fine, but please make it clear in > each commit message"? I am fine with this change. If commit msg had such statement, I would not have doubts :/ Best regards, Krzysztof
