On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 01:51:42PM +0300, Iuliana Prodan wrote: > On 9/12/2023 12:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 12/09/2023 10:49, Iuliana Prodan wrote: > > > > > Should I test this on other tree(s)? > > > > You test the patch on the tree you send it. What is the point to test it > > > > on some old code, cherry-pick with bugs and then send? > > > > > > > > If you have cross-tree dependencies between subsystem, isn't linux-next > > > > for this? > > > TBH, I don't know, that's why I asked. > > > > > > For sure one patch is for remoteproc. > > > For the other, I don't know who will pick it, but I'll tested on > > > linux-next, as you suggested. > > MAINTAINERS file (and get_maintainers.pl) will tell you. Specifically, > > this does not look really related to remoteproc patch, so it should not > > be together in one patchset. > > Hi Mathieu, > > I need to send a v2 - to fix the dtsi missing bracket on patch 2. > So, should I keep the 2 patches together or send them separately? > Marco is already aware of this patchset so I would keep them together. > Thanks, > Iulia > > >
