Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] add support MDP3 on MT8195 platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 12/09/23 11:37, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:00 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Il 12/09/23 09:57, Moudy Ho ha scritto:
Changes since v4:
- Rebase on v6.6-rc1
- Remove any unnecessary DTS settings.
- Adjust the usage of MOD and clock in blending components.

Changes since v3:
- Depend on :
    [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=719841
- Suggested by Krzysztof, integrating all newly added bindings for
    the mt8195 MDP3 into the file "mediatek,mt8195-mdp3.yaml".
- Revise MDP3 nodes with generic names.

Changes since v2:
- Depend on :
    [1] MMSYS/MUTEX: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=711592
    [2] MDP3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=711618
- Suggested by Rob to revise MDP3 bindings to pass dtbs check
- Add parallel paths feature.
- Add blended components settings.

Changes since v1:
- Depend on :
    [1] MDP3 : https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=698872
    [2] MMSYS/MUTEX: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=684959
- Fix compilation failure due to use of undeclared identifier in file "mtk-mdp3-cmdq.c"

Hello,

This patch is used to add support for MDP3 on the MT8195 platform that
contains more picture quality components, and can arrange more pipelines
through two sets of MMSYS and MUTEX respectively.

Moudy Ho (14):
    arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8183: correct MDP3 DMA-related nodes
    arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: add MDP3 nodes

Please send the DTS patches separately, those go through a different maintainer.

I thought most people prefer the _full_ view in a patchset?


Yeah but those going through a different maintainer makes it more straightforward
to pick; besides, essentially, you can also get a full view with dt-bindings
patches instead of devicetrees, as the latter are "constructed from" bindings
anyway.

Moreover, it would be definitely nice to add a link to the devicetree series
in the cover letter of this series, so that people *do* get a full overview
by checking both series :-)

Cheers!

P.S.: The dt-bindings patch can be sent inside of this series, please do that.

Thanks!
Angelo






[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux