On 12/23/2014 12:40 PM, Varka Bhadram wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This patch adds exynos-ppmu devfreq-event driver to get performance data >> of each IP for Samsung Exynos SoC. These event from Exynos PPMU provide >> useful information about the behavior of the SoC that you can use when >> analyzing system performance, and made visible and can be counted using >> logic in each IP. >> >> This patch is based on existing drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos-ppmu.c >> >> Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > (...) >> +static int exynos_ppmu_parse_dt(struct exynos_ppmu_data *data) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev = data->dev; >> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + if (!np) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to find devicetree node\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* Maps the memory mapped IO to control PPMU register */ >> + data->ppmu.base = of_iomap(np, 0); >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->ppmu.base)) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to map memory region\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; > -ENOMEM or -ENXIO is the proper error return value..? OK. I'll return -ENOMEM value. > >> + } >> + >> + data->clk_ppmu = devm_clk_get(dev, "ppmu"); >> + if (IS_ERR(data->clk_ppmu)) { >> + data->clk_ppmu = NULL; >> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get PPMU clock\n"); >> + } > If PPMU clk get fails..? return PTR_ERR(data->clk_ppmu) If Exynos SoC don't register the clock to clock tree, the clock remains on state. So, I print just warning message. But, It is not proper. I'll fix it. >> + >> + ret = of_get_devfreq_events(np, data); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to parse exynos ppmu dt node\n"); >> + goto err; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> + >> +err: >> + iounmap(data->ppmu.base); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int exynos_ppmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct exynos_ppmu_data *data; >> + struct devfreq_event_dev **edev; >> + struct devfreq_event_desc *desc; >> + int i, ret = 0, size; >> + >> + data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!data) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + mutex_init(&data->lock); >> + data->dev = &pdev->dev; >> + >> + /* Parse dt data to get resource */ >> + ret = exynos_ppmu_parse_dt(data); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, >> + "failed to parse devicetree for resource\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + desc = data->desc; >> + >> + size = sizeof(struct devfreq_event_dev *) * data->num_events; >> + data->edev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!data->edev) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, >> + "failed to allocate memory devfreq-event devices\n"); >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> + edev = data->edev; >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data); >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < data->num_events; i++) { >> + edev[i] = devfreq_event_add_edev(&pdev->dev, &desc[i]); >> + if (IS_ERR(edev)) { >> + ret = PTR_ERR(edev); >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, >> + "failed to add devfreq-event device\n"); >> + goto err; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + clk_prepare_enable(data->clk_ppmu); >> + >> + return 0; >> +err: >> + iounmap(data->ppmu.base); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int exynos_ppmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct exynos_ppmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> + int i, ret = 0; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < data->num_events; i++) { >> + ret = devfreq_event_remove_edev(data->edev[i]); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, >> + "failed to remove devfreq-event device\n"); >> + goto err; >> + } >> + } >> + >> +err: >> + clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk_ppmu); >> + iounmap(data->ppmu.base); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static struct of_device_id exynos_ppmu_id_match[] = { >> + { .compatible = "samsung,exynos-ppmu", }, >> + { /* sentinel */ }, >> +}; >> + >> +static struct platform_driver exynos_ppmu_driver = { >> + .probe = exynos_ppmu_probe, >> + .remove = exynos_ppmu_remove, >> + .driver = { >> + .name = "exynos-ppmu", >> + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > remove owner field. It will be populate by driver core. OK. I'll remove it. Thanks for your review. Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html