On Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:30:47 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 12:34:58PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > I came up with the following alternative approach, which is as usual > > completely untested. It is entirely based on the quirk infrastructure, > > and doesn't touch the ACPI path at all. > > The patch below makes sense and it is much cleaner - provided we > consider this a quirk, which I am not sure it is, that's the only > question I have. Come on, the whole architecture is a bag of sick hacks. And given that it makes the change slightly less ugly, I'd rather have that. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
