Konrad Dybcio писал(а) 05.09.2023 13:35:
> On 5.09.2023 07:47, Nikita Travkin wrote:
>> sc7180 has a dedicated ADSP similar to the one found in sm8250.
>> Add it's compatible to the driver reusing the existing config so
>> the devices that use the adsp can probe it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin <nikita@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> index b5447dd2dd35..55fafc68200e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> @@ -1161,6 +1161,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id adsp_of_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-adsp-pas", .data = &adsp_resource_init },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-cdsp-pas", .data = &cdsp_resource_init },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-wcss-pas", .data = &wcss_resource_init },
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-adsp-pas", .data = &sm8250_adsp_resource},
> Should we use a fallback here, maybe?
>
Not sure if it makes sense to, given afaiu no other soc defines two
compatibles for the adsp right now...
> Konrad
