On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 08:38:32PM +0800, Binbin Zhou wrote: > Document the Power Management Unit system controller compatible for > Loongson-2K2000. > > This is a missing compatible, now we add it. > > Signed-off-by: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/soc/loongson/loongson,ls2k-pmc.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/loongson/loongson,ls2k-pmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/loongson/loongson,ls2k-pmc.yaml > index da2dcfeebf12..7473c5659929 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/loongson/loongson,ls2k-pmc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/loongson/loongson,ls2k-pmc.yaml > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ properties: > - enum: > - loongson,ls2k0500-pmc > - loongson,ls2k1000-pmc > + - loongson,ls2k2000-pmc Same thing here as the driver patch, the pmc on this newly added SoC appears to use the same codepaths as the existing ones. Does it share a programming model & should there be a fallback compatible here? > - const: syscon > > reg: > -- > 2.39.3 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature