On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 08:38:33PM +0800, Binbin Zhou wrote:
> Add compatible for Loongson-2K2000, which also has the Loongson2
> Power Management Unit system controller.
>
> This is a missing compatible, now we add it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/soc/loongson/loongson2_pm.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/loongson/loongson2_pm.c b/drivers/soc/loongson/loongson2_pm.c
> index 796add6e8b63..6d2b3708e947 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/loongson/loongson2_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/loongson/loongson2_pm.c
> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static int loongson2_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> static const struct of_device_id loongson2_pm_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "loongson,ls2k0500-pmc", },
> { .compatible = "loongson,ls2k1000-pmc", },
> + { .compatible = "loongson,ls2k2000-pmc", },
You've not added any new codepaths for this soc, so it is compatible
with the existing ones. Why are you not using fallback compatibles for
this?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
