Hi, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Rockchip I2C the controller drops SDA low in the repeated start > condition at half the SCL high time. > > If we want to meet timing requirements, that means we need to hold SCL > high for (4.7us * 2) when we're sending a repeated start (.6us * 2 for > Fast-mode). That lets us achieve minimum tSU;STA. However, we don't > want to always hold SCL high for that long because we'd never be able > to make 100kHz or 400kHz speeds. > > Let's fix this by doing our clock calculations twice: once taking the > above into account and once running at normal speeds. We'll use the > slower speed when sending the start bit and the normal speed > otherwise. > > Note: we really only need the conservative timing when sending > _repeated_ starts, not when sending the first start. We don't account > for this so technically the first start bit will be longer too. > ...well, except in the case when we use the combined write/read > optimization which doesn't use the same code. > > As part of this change we needed to account for the SDA falling time. > The specification indicates that this should be the same, but we'll > follow Designware and add a binding. Note that we deviate from > Designware and assign the default SDA falling time to be the same as > the SCL falling time, which is incredibly likely. > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Note: This is based on Addy's patch (i2c: rk3x: fix bug that cause > measured high_ns doesn't meet I2C specification) that can be found at > <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5475331/>. > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt | 7 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++----- > 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) So apparently the person who tested this for me got mixed up and told me it was good, but it wasn't. :( I've sent up a new version. I've tested it myself this time but certainly would appreciate any extra testing folks can do on it... See <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5515551/> -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html