On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 1:43:08 AM CEST Andrew Lunn wrote: > Maybe a dumb question. Does I2C core still ignore the vendor part? Its > a long time since i did anything with i2c, but i thought for > historical reasons it ignore the vendor? > > If this is still true, then yes, this is just a spelling > error. However, if the vendor is being used to match device to driver, > this is more than a spelling issue, and should be directed to stable. I have just tested this by changing the MUIC compatible on my (not yet upstreamed) samsung,coreprimevelte board from "siliconmitus,sm5504-muic" to "siliconnitus,sm5504-muic". With this change USB no longer works, presumably because USB probing gets deferred forever since this MUIC referenced in USB's extcon never gets probed. I assume this PMIC would behave identically and thus this should go to stable. Would this be done by sending a v2 with the Cc: tag added? Regards, Duje
