On 24.08.2023 20:24, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:28 PM David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Cheza firmware doesn't allow controlling LMh from the operating system.
>>
>> Fixes: 36c6581214c4 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add support for LMh node")
>> Suggested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
>> index d86b0d112110..8cc8fc290fd3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
>> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ panel_in_edp: endpoint {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> +&cpufreq_hw {
>> + /delete-property/ interrupts-extended; /* reference to lmh_cluster[01] */
>> +};
>> +
>> &psci {
>> /delete-node/ power-domain-cpu0;
>> /delete-node/ power-domain-cpu1;
>> @@ -275,6 +279,14 @@ &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1
>> &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
>> };
>>
>> +&lmh_cluster0 {
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lmh_cluster1 {
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +};
>
> It's not a huge deal to me, but as I understand it usually you'd put
> the "disabled" in sdm845.dtsi and then it would be up to all the other
> sdm845 boards to mark this as "okay".
it's more of a status = "nonstandardfirmware" :/
>
>
>> /*
>> * Reserved memory changes
>> *
>> @@ -338,6 +350,8 @@ flash@0 {
>>
>>
>> &apps_rsc {
>> + /delete-property/ power-domains;
>> +
>
> Is the deletion of the "power-domains" here related to LMh? That seems
> like it was added to sdm845.dtsi in a separate commit that doesn't
> talk about LMh at all...
psci
