On 08/08/2023 14:36, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 12:27 AM
>> To: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@xxxxxxx>; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; clin@xxxxxxxx;
>> conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; pierre.gondois@xxxxxxx; Jacky Bai
>> <ping.bai@xxxxxxx>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@xxxxxxx>; Wei Fang
>> <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>; Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>; Bough Chen
>> <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx>; festevam@xxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux-
>> imx@xxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gaurav Jain
>> <gaurav.jain@xxxxxxx>; alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sahil Malhotra
>> <sahil.malhotra@xxxxxxx>; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>; Varun
>> Sethi <V.Sethi@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock
>> Enclave
>>
>> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
>> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
>> this email' button
>>
>>
>> On 12/07/2023 14:12, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>>> The Edgelock Enclave , is the secure enclave embedded in the SoC to
>>> support the features like HSM, SHE & V2X, using message based
>>> communication channel.
>>>
>>> ELE FW communicates on a dedicated MU with application core where
>>> kernel is running. It exists on specific i.MX processors. e.g.
>>> i.MX8ULP, i.MX93.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Jain <gaurav.jain@xxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@xxxxxxx>
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> What did the robot report? New driver?
> [Pankaj] reported printf format-specifier for size_t.
That's not what you said here. You said robot reported the driver.
...
>>> +
>>> + pr_info("Misc-devices on i.MX enclave MU is configured.\n");
>>
>> No silly probe success messages.
> [Accepted] Will removed in V5.
I still found more.
>>
>>
>>> + return devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>>
>> No. You do not have children. Just open your own binding and look there.
>>
>> This driver is in terrible shape and I asked to do some internal review in NXP.
>> Internal review should point such trivial comments but your changelog from
>> v1 tp v4 says nothing about it.
>>
>> So internal review did not happen. Don't use upstream as cheap reviewers for
>> poor quality code. Please work internally till it starts looking correct and all
>> automated tools pass. NXP is not some small, amateour company which can be
>> excused of this. Or is it?
I don't think much improved here... Still no coccinelle, probably no
other tools. You Cc-ed like 10 NXP people, for what? Did they provide
reviews?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
