On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 4:45 PM John Watts <contact@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 07:27:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > You'd have to define an enum for that but it does still feel like it > > might be easier to work with since it's more direct. > > Alright, I'll give it a go in the next version. Thanks for the feedback! That property will need a vendor prefix as well which was missing here. Rob
