> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 8:19 PM
> To: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@xxxxxxx>; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx;
> s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; clin@xxxxxxxx;
> conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; pierre.gondois@xxxxxxx; Jacky Bai
> <ping.bai@xxxxxxx>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@xxxxxxx>; Wei Fang
> <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>; Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>; Bough Chen
> <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx>; festevam@xxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux-
> imx@xxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gaurav Jain
> <gaurav.jain@xxxxxxx>; alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sahil Malhotra
> <sahil.malhotra@xxxxxxx>; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>;
> Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: added nxp
> secure enclave firmware
>
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
> this email' button
>
>
> On 08/08/2023 13:07, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 12:08 AM
> >> To: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@xxxxxxx>; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >> s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; clin@xxxxxxxx;
> >> conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; pierre.gondois@xxxxxxx; Jacky Bai
> >> <ping.bai@xxxxxxx>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@xxxxxxx>; Wei Fang
> >> <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>; Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>; Bough Chen
> >> <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx>; festevam@xxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux-
> >> imx@xxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gaurav Jain
> >> <gaurav.jain@xxxxxxx>; alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sahil
> >> Malhotra <sahil.malhotra@xxxxxxx>; Aisheng Dong
> >> <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>; Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@xxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: added nxp
> >> secure enclave firmware
> >>
> >> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking
> >> links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using
> >> the 'Report this email' button
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/07/2023 14:12, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >>> Added support for NXP secure enclave called EdgeLock Enclave
> >>> firmware
> >>> (se-fw) for imx8ulp-evk.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@xxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi | 12 +++++++++++-
> >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> >>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> >>> index 3ddc0f3125b3..10ed31974a6f 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> >>> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ sosc: clock-sosc {
> >>> #clock-cells = <0>;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> - sram@2201f000 {
> >>> + sram0: sram@2201f000 {
> >>> compatible = "mmio-sram";
> >>> reg = <0x0 0x2201f000 0x0 0x1000>;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -161,6 +161,16 @@ s4muap: mailbox@27020000 {
> >>> #mbox-cells = <2>;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> + ele_fw: se-fw {
> >>> + compatible = "fsl,imx-ele";
> >>> + mboxes = <&s4muap 0 0 &s4muap 1 0>;
> >>> + mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
> >>> + fsl,mu-did = <7>;
> >>> + fsl,mu-id = <2>;
> >>> + sram-pool = <&sram0>;
> >>
> >> It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
> >> `make dtbs_check` (see
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
> >>
Following tests (1 &2) were performed:
1. make -j32. Build the images and DTB to test the functionality.
2. make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=freescale.
3. make CHECK_DTBS=y freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dtb
Before sending the V4 patch for review, I have ran tests 1 &2. Both were passing.
But after seeing the page shared by you, ran the 3rd test and I was able to reproduce the issue, you might be referring to.
For V5, I will perform all the 3 tests.
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww
> w
> >> .li%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cpankaj.gupta%40nxp.com%7Cfce997832862
> 4056830408
> >>
> db981e9af6%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6382
> 710294401
> >>
> 41352%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2
> luMzIiLCJ
> >>
> BTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Ki%2BHqff7
> rZbTAnAbJ
> >> ZgRiwxGUx0qJjYzxIjMHNoyM8s%3D&reserved=0
> >> naro.org%2Fblog%2Ftips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-w
> >> ith-
> >> the-devicetree-
> >>
> schema%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cpankaj.gupta%40nxp.com%7Cd13d0b68d0
> 1c
> >>
> 4d10d8cb08db83070ed2%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%
> >>
> 7C0%7C638247838553225400%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM
> C
> >>
> 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000
> %7
> >>
> C%7C%7C&sdata=pO6dnz4aPqVejRNDR0OU4n04hXebyqgrNKg4DPhahI0%3
> D
> >> &reserved=0
> >> for instructions).
> >
> > Tested. Before submitting the patch.
> > [Pankaj] Accepted.
>
> You really tested that patch? Before I waste my time on proving it was not,
> are you 100% sure that you tested that patch and no new warnings are
> printed? Or are you just agreeing with me that this time you will test?
> >
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
