Re: [PATCHv1] rtc: bcm-iproc: Add support for Broadcom iproc rtc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On 14-12-16 12:27 PM, Ray Jui wrote:


On 12/16/2014 12:19 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 12:05:08 Arun Ramamurthy wrote:
On 14-12-16 11:42 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 11:22:30 arun.ramamurthy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
+       rtc: iproc_rtc@0x03026000 {
+               compatible = "brcm,iproc-rtc";
+               reg =   spru_bbl:               <0x03026000 0xC>,
+                       crmu_pwr_good_status:   <0x0301C02C 0x14>,
+                       crmu_bbl_auth:          <0x03024C74 0x8>;
+               interrupts = spru_rtc_periodic: <GIC_SPI 142
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+                            spru_alarm:        <GIC_SPI 133
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

The reg properties look really random, could it be that the registers
are really part of some other device that contains multiple functions?

This RTC block is on a battery backed logic island and is accessed
indirectly using the spru_bbl registers. The CRMU registers are required
to read the power status and write to some authentication registers.
Without writing to these authentication
registers, we cannot access any of the spru_bbl registers. In conclusion
I don't think the CRMU register accesses can be considered as another
device access. Do you agree Arnd?

It sounds like CRMU is some other unit aside from the RTC. Could this
be something like a generic system controller? I think it should
either have its own driver or use the syscon logic if that is what
this is.

Giving that CRMU has scattered, miscellaneous control logic for multiple
different peripherals, it probably makes more sense to use the syscon
logic here.

Arnd, thanks for the feedback. If I was to write a separate driver for the CRMU, I would have to export certain functions and create an api that only this RTC driver would use. I am not sure that is efficient or required. What is your opinion? Would it be better if I use the syson api in my current driver and move the CRMU registers to separate syscon device tree entry?

Also, what do you use the labels for?

The labels are purely to improve readability of the device tree entry

Please remove them then, they don't help at all.

Sure, I will remove the labels
    Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux