On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 01:43:08PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 17:03-20230810, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 10:23:12AM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > > > From: Bryan Brattlof <bb@xxxxxx> > > > > > > Add bindings for TI's AM62P5 family of devices. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@xxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml | 6 ++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml > > > index 5ca6af492507..93b2774cc0a9 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml > > > @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ properties: > > > - ti,am62a7-sk > > > - const: ti,am62a7 > > > > > > + - description: K3 AM62P5 SoC > > > > SoC seems a bit off here, since the sk is actually a board using the > > SoC, but it seems to be the convention for TI stuff, > > Thanks for providing that perspective - there will be new boards > getting added to the enum list, they should be one line additions at > this point. > > But, your point taken. K3 AM625P SoC based boards is more appropriate. > > I can do the local change as I apply and keep your ack unless you > object. Oh totally no objection, "xyz SoC based boards" is what most people seem to use. > > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > + items: > > > + - enum: > > > + - ti,am62p5-sk > > > + - const: ti,am62p5 > > > + > > > - description: K3 AM625 SoC PHYTEC phyBOARD-Lyra > > > items: > > > - const: phytec,am625-phyboard-lyra-rdk > > > -- > > > 2.41.0 > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Nishanth Menon > Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
