On 2023/8/10 19:28:23, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 09:46, Samin Guo <samin.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Fixed configuration to improve the speed of TCP RX.
>>
>> Before:
>> # iperf3 -s
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> Server listening on 5201 (test #1)
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> Accepted connection from 192.168.1.4, port 47604
>> [ 5] local 192.168.1.3 port 5201 connected to 192.168.1.4 port 47612
>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
>> [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 36.3 MBytes 305 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 35.6 MBytes 299 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 36.5 MBytes 306 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 36.5 MBytes 306 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 35.7 MBytes 300 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 35.4 MBytes 297 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 37.1 MBytes 311 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 35.6 MBytes 298 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 36.4 MBytes 305 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 36.3 MBytes 304 Mbits/sec
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
>> [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 361 MBytes 303 Mbits/sec receiver
>>
>> After:
>> # iperf3 -s
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> Server listening on 5201 (test #1)
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> Accepted connection from 192.168.1.4, port 47710
>> [ 5] local 192.168.1.3 port 5201 connected to 192.168.1.4 port 47720
>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
>> [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 111 MBytes 932 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 111 MBytes 934 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 111 MBytes 934 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 111 MBytes 934 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 111 MBytes 934 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 111 MBytes 935 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 111 MBytes 934 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 111 MBytes 935 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 111 MBytes 934 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 111 MBytes 934 Mbits/sec
>> [ 5] 10.00-10.00 sec 167 KBytes 933 Mbits/sec
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
>> [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 934 Mbits/sec receiver
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Samin Guo <samin.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> index a608433200e8..76884cf373bf 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> @@ -318,8 +318,8 @@
>>
>> stmmac_axi_setup: stmmac-axi-config {
>> snps,lpi_en;
>> - snps,wr_osr_lmt = <4>;
>> - snps,rd_osr_lmt = <4>;
>> + snps,wr_osr_lmt = <0xf>;
>> + snps,rd_osr_lmt = <0xf>;
>
> nit: this is a limit, so presumably counting things and not an address
> or bitmask, so I'd prefer decimal numbers here, eg <15>.
>
> It works fine either way, so
> Reviewed-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks Esmil, that's right.
I refer to examples of snps,dwmac.yaml, so I use 0xf...
Best regards,
Samin
>
>> snps,blen = <256 128 64 32 0 0 0>;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -839,7 +839,7 @@
>> rx-fifo-depth = <2048>;
>> tx-fifo-depth = <2048>;
>> snps,multicast-filter-bins = <64>;
>> - snps,perfect-filter-entries = <8>;
>> + snps,perfect-filter-entries = <256>;
>> snps,fixed-burst;
>> snps,no-pbl-x8;
>> snps,force_thresh_dma_mode;
>> @@ -870,7 +870,7 @@
>> rx-fifo-depth = <2048>;
>> tx-fifo-depth = <2048>;
>> snps,multicast-filter-bins = <64>;
>> - snps,perfect-filter-entries = <8>;
>> + snps,perfect-filter-entries = <256>;
>> snps,fixed-burst;
>> snps,no-pbl-x8;
>> snps,force_thresh_dma_mode;
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
