On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:39:40AM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: > From: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Document the Anbernic RG351V panel, which appears to be identical to > the panel used in their 353 series except for in inclusion of an > additional DSI format flag. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml | 18 ++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml > index 116c1b6030a2..576f3640cb33 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml > @@ -7,9 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > title: NewVision NV3051D based LCD panel > > description: | > - The NewVision NV3051D is a driver chip used to drive DSI panels. For now, > - this driver only supports the 640x480 panels found in the Anbernic RG353 > - based devices. > + The NewVision NV3051D is a driver chip used to drive DSI panels. > > maintainers: > - Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > @@ -19,11 +17,15 @@ allOf: > > properties: > compatible: > - items: > - - enum: > - - anbernic,rg353p-panel > - - anbernic,rg353v-panel > - - const: newvision,nv3051d > + oneOf: > + - items: > + - enum: > + - anbernic,rg353p-panel > + - anbernic,rg353v-panel > + - const: newvision,nv3051d > + > + - items: > + - const: anbernic,rg351v-panel I don't understand. Is this panel not based on newvision,nv3051d? If not, then it probably should be a different binding. Lot's of panel bindings have similar properties. Rob
