On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 05:06:14PM +0500, Nikita Travkin wrote: > Conor Dooley писал(а) 29.07.2023 15:03: > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 10:19:30PM +0500, Nikita Travkin wrote: > >> + interrupt-names: > >> + items: > >> + - const: fifo > > > > Same here, but do you really need a name, when you have only one > > interrupt? > > > > Hm, thinking of this more, the hardware actually has more than one > interrupt, even though this one seems to be the only really useful > one. Would a better way forward be to list all of them Yes. > (and fix > the driver to get the value by it's name) It's not a fix to do that, the order of the interrupts is not variable, so there's nothing wrong with using the indices. You can do it if you like. > or it would be > acceptable to leave the names here and extend the list at a later > date when (if ever) other interrupts are needed? If you know what they are, please describe them now, even if the driver does not use them (yet). Thanks, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
