On 28/07/2023 12:28, Varshini Rajendran wrote: > Remove microchip,sam9x60-spi compatible from the list as the fallback is > really atmel,at91rm9200-spi. Sorry, this explanation tells me nothing. The fallback is really microchip,sam9x60-spi... You need to explain in commit msg why sam9x60 is incorrect as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml > index 58367587bfbc..32e7c14033c2 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml > @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ properties: > - const: atmel,at91rm9200-spi > - items: > - const: microchip,sam9x7-spi > - - const: microchip,sam9x60-spi If that's true, then it should be part of previous enum. > - const: atmel,at91rm9200-spi > > reg: Best regards, Krzysztof
