On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 04:33:26PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:18 PM Steve Clevenger OS > <scclevenger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Rafael, Len, > > > > On 7/24/2023 9:25 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > > > Hi Rafael/Len > > > > > > On 19/07/2023 11:11, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > > >> Rafael, Len > > >> > > >> Ping (packets 6, lost 100%). > > >> > > >> > > >> On 10/07/2023 17:40, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > > >>> Rafael, Len > > >>> > > >>> On 10/07/2023 07:25, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > >>>> From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> > > >>>> > > >>>> Drop ETM4X ACPI ID from the AMBA ACPI device list, and instead just > > >>>> move it > > >>>> inside the new ACPI devices list detected and used via platform driver. > > >>>> > > >>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >>>> Cc: coresight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >>>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >>>> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> (for ACPI specific > > >>>> changes) > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> > > >>> > > >>> We would like to queue this via coresight tree. The acpi_amba bits have > > >>> been reviewed by Sudeep. Please could you give us an Ack, if you are > > >>> happy with the proposal ? > > >>> > > > > > > Please could one of you respond to this patch ? We are blocked on your > > > Ack for queuing this. There are machines out there, which rely on this > > > patch to use Arm self-hosted tracing based on CoreSight. > > > > > > Kind regards > > > Suzuki > > > > Ampere Computing AmpereOne machines rely on this patch series to enable > > System Register Access to the ETMv4. Ampere removed the ETM MMIO > > descriptions from our CoreSight ACPI to use this. > > > > Suzuki's e-mail requests for review/Ack of this patch thread date back > > to May 30. > > I've just talked to Suzuki about this: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230726140515.368981-1-suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx > > This patch has received a Reviewed-by from Sudeep which for all > purposes should be sufficient for any ARM-related ACPI material that > doesn't affect any other architectures. An ACK from me (or Len for > that matter) would not make any real difference from the technical > perspective. > > I would appreciate assigning an official ARM maintainer to acpi_amba.c > so as to avoid such unnecessary delays in the future. Ah I just crossed and replied on other thread. I will soon send an update to add this file under Arm ACPI for the maintenance. -- Regards, Sudeep
