On 25/07/2023 13:46, Marijn Suijten wrote: > On 2023-07-25 12:16:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Example DTS should not have 'status' property. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6125-mdss.yaml | 6 ------ > > This is not needed: it has already been corrected in v3 and v4 of the > respective series (among other changes) and the patches were only picked > to a preliminary (draft) pull to get an overview of the outstanding work > for this subsystem. That branch happens to be included in regular -next > releases though. > > 6.6 drm/msm display pull: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/merge_requests/69 > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230718-sm6125-dpu-v3-0-6c5a56e99820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230723-sm6125-dpu-v4-0-a3f287dd6c07@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ What do you mean? The old code (one I am fixing) is in current next... If this was fixed, why next gets some outdated branches of drm next? Each maintainers next tree is supposed to be fed into the next, without delays. Best regards, Krzysztof
