Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: Replace deprecated extcon-usb-gpio id-gpio/vbus-gpio properties

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Am Freitag, 21. Juli 2023, 14:22:06 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 21/07/2023 10:19, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > Use id-gpios and vbus-gpios instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> #rockchip
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx> #mediatek
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Shawn Guo
> > <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > * Rebased to next-20230721
> > * Split from bindings patch
> 
> I think you wanted to split it per subsystem, right? That's why you
> resent/v3? But the split did not happen.

Yes, I split it into dt bindings and DT changes patches. Is this not correct?

> If you decide not to split,
> then try to figure out: who should pick up this patchset?

Well, intention was one patch for DT bindings maintainers and these two 
patches for imx maintainer (Shawn AFAIK). I've send patches separated by arch/
arm and arch/arm64 in one series, so I'm slightly confused now.

Best regards,
Alexander
-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
http://www.tq-group.com/






[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux