Re: [PATCH] firmware: Explicitly include correct DT includes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:44:37AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
> of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
> As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
> "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
> and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
> files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
> replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
> explicitly include the correct includes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 ++--
>  drivers/firmware/imx/imx-dsp.c     | 1 -
>  drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-irq.c | 1 +
>  drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c     | 1 +
>  drivers/firmware/mtk-adsp-ipc.c    | 1 -
>  drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c     | 1 +
>  drivers/firmware/scpi_pm_domain.c  | 3 ++-
>  drivers/firmware/stratix10-rsu.c   | 1 -
>  drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c      | 3 +--
>  drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c   | 1 +
>  10 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Not sure about the other maintainers, but I usually pick up
firmware/tegra patches up through the Tegra tree and then they
ultimately go through ARM SoC.

Arnd, Olof, does it make sense for you guys to pick this up directly?

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux