The recent necessary overhaul [1] of how we represent SMD ICC and RPM bus clocks changed the way they're connected. The bindings however were not updated to reflect that. This series tries to address that, while also making the relevant bindings less convoluted. Now, instead of referencing RPM SMD bus clocks via clocks=<>, they're handled internally within the interconnect framework (via direct RPM calls from there). We still need to allow some "interface" clocks, which are necessary to access some registers and not managed for us. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230526-topic-smd_icc-v7-0-09c78c175546@xxxxxxxxxx/ Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Konrad Dybcio (7): dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Introduce qcom,rpm-common dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: qcm2290: Remove RPM bus clocks dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Fix and separate out MSM8916 dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Fix and separate out QCS404 dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Fix and separate out SDM660 dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Fix and separate out MSM8996 dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Fix and separate out MSM8939 .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8916.yaml | 52 ++++ .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml | 74 ++++++ .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8996.yaml | 165 ++++++++++++ .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,qcm2290.yaml | 54 +--- .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,qcs404.yaml | 52 ++++ .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpm-common.yaml | 31 +++ .../devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpm.yaml | 281 --------------------- .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm660.yaml | 131 ++++++++++ 8 files changed, 509 insertions(+), 331 deletions(-) --- base-commit: ae867bc97b713121b2a7f5fcac68378a0774739b change-id: 20230721-topic-icc_bindings-72917016f595 Best regards, -- Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
