On 20/07/2023 17:40, Andrea Collamati wrote: > Add documentation for MCP4728 > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Collamati <andrea.collamati@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml | 48 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..6fd9be076245 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/dac/microchip,mcp4728.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Microchip MCP4728 DAC > + > +description: > + MCP4728 is a quad channel, 12-bit voltage output > + Digital-to-Analog Converter with non-volatile > + memory and I2C compatible Serial Interface. > + https://www.microchip.com/en-us/product/mcp4728 > + > +maintainers: > + - Andrea Collamati <andrea.collamati@xxxxxxxxx> > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - microchip,mcp4728 This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. Thank you. > + reg: > + maxItems: 1 > + > + vdd-supply: > + description: | > + Provides both power and acts as the reference supply on the MCP4728 > + when Internal Vref is not selected. > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + - vdd-supply > + > +additionalProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + i2c { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + mcp4728@60 { The same... Probably more comments were ignored, so: This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. Thank you. Best regards, Krzysztof
