Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Sort spmi_bus node numerically by reg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 19/07/23 23:54, Marijn Suijten ha scritto:
On 2023-07-19 01:02:56, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 19/07/2023 00:24, Marijn Suijten wrote:
This node has always resided in the wrong spot, making it somewhat
harder to contribute new node entries while maintaining proper sorting
around it.  Move the node up to sit after hsusb_phy1 where it maintains
proper numerical sorting on the (first of its many) reg address
property.

Fixes: cff4bbaf2a2d ("arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for SM6125")
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 38 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
index 6937c7ebdb81..cfd0901d4555 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
@@ -684,6 +684,24 @@ hsusb_phy1: phy@1613000 {
   			status = "disabled";
   		};
+ spmi_bus: spmi@1c40000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
+			reg = <0x01c40000 0x1100>,
+			      <0x01e00000 0x2000000>,
+			      <0x03e00000 0x100000>,
+			      <0x03f00000 0xa0000>,
+			      <0x01c0a000 0x26000>;
+			reg-names = "core", "chnls", "obsrvr", "intr", "cnfg";
+			interrupt-names = "periph_irq";
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 183 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			qcom,ee = <0>;
+			qcom,channel = <0>;
+			#address-cells = <2>;
+			#size-cells = <0>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			#interrupt-cells = <4>;
+		};
+
   		rpm_msg_ram: sram@45f0000 {
   			compatible = "qcom,rpm-msg-ram";
   			reg = <0x045f0000 0x7000>;
@@ -1189,27 +1207,9 @@ sram@4690000 {
   			reg = <0x04690000 0x10000>;
   		};
- spmi_bus: spmi@1c40000 {
-			compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
-			reg = <0x01c40000 0x1100>,
-			      <0x01e00000 0x2000000>,
-			      <0x03e00000 0x100000>,
-			      <0x03f00000 0xa0000>,
-			      <0x01c0a000 0x26000>;
-			reg-names = "core", "chnls", "obsrvr", "intr", "cnfg";
-			interrupt-names = "periph_irq";
-			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 183 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
-			qcom,ee = <0>;
-			qcom,channel = <0>;
-			#address-cells = <2>;
-			#size-cells = <0>;
-			interrupt-controller;
-			#interrupt-cells = <4>;
-		};
-
   		apps_smmu: iommu@c600000 {
   			compatible = "qcom,sm6125-smmu-500", "qcom,smmu-500", "arm,mmu-500";
-			reg = <0xc600000 0x80000>;
+			reg = <0x0c600000 0x80000>;

Irrelevant, please split.

This was already here in v1, and it is what likely contributed to the
sorting mismatch in the first place.

But will split it and send a v4 for just this...


I agree in that it is irrelevant, but anyway, for the next time: you should at
least mention "the other change" in your commit message ;-)

Also, remember that this commit has a Fixes tag........ :-)

Cheers,
Angelo






[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux