On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 07:09:46PM +0800, Jason-ch Chen wrote: > From: jason-ch chen <Jason-ch.Chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The reason for changing the patch was that while MT8188 uses the same > pwrap as MT8195, > the original code was only applicable to 'compatible = > "mediatek,mt8188-pwrap"'. I don't really understand what this means. Did you mean, "the original binding only allowed..."? If so, Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Conor. > To resolve the DTBS check warning that > '['mediatek,mt8188-pwrap', 'mediatek,mt8195-pwrap', 'syscon'] is too > long', it is necessary to modify the code. > > Signed-off-by: jason-ch chen <Jason-ch.Chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,pwrap.yaml | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,pwrap.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,pwrap.yaml > index a06ac2177444..4737e5f45d54 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,pwrap.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,pwrap.yaml > @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ properties: > - mediatek,mt8173-pwrap > - mediatek,mt8183-pwrap > - mediatek,mt8186-pwrap > - - mediatek,mt8188-pwrap > - mediatek,mt8195-pwrap > - mediatek,mt8365-pwrap > - mediatek,mt8516-pwrap > @@ -50,6 +49,11 @@ properties: > - mediatek,mt8186-pwrap > - mediatek,mt8195-pwrap > - const: syscon > + - items: > + - enum: > + - mediatek,mt8188-pwrap > + - const: mediatek,mt8195-pwrap > + - const: syscon > > reg: > minItems: 1 > -- > 2.18.0 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
