On 18/07/2023 13:36, Frank Binns wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 13:10 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 18/07/2023 13:08, Frank Binns wrote: >>>> And this >>>> items: >>>> - const: gpu >>>> can just be >>>> const: gpu >>>> >>>> Although, if there is only one interrupt this is probably not >>>> particularly helpful. Are there other implementations of this IP that >>>> have more interrupts? >>> >>> No, all our current GPUs just have a single interrupt. I assume it's more future >>> proof to keep the name in case that ever changes? >> >> Why do you need name in the first place? If there is single entry, the >> name is pointless, especially if it repeats the name of the IP block. >> >>> As in, by having the name now >>> we can make it a required property, which I guess we won't be able to do at some >>> later point. >> >> Why even making it required? > > It seems nicer to look up a resource in the driver based on a name rather than > an index. Not really... Slower and confuses people, because then they think order is flexible. Best regards, Krzysztof
