Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2023年7月14日 週五 下午5:59寫道： > > On 7/14/23 00:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 14/07/2023 09:04, 蔡承達 wrote: > > > >> > This is because our register layout for PWM and Tach is not > >> continuous. > >> > >> > PWM0 used 0x0 0x4, Tach0 used 0x8 0xc > >> > >> > PWM1 used 0x10 0x14, Tach1 used 0x18 0x1c > >> > >> > ... > >> > >> > Each PWM/Tach instance has its own controller register and is not > >> dependent on others. > > > > Your email reply quoting style is very difficult to read. > > > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi Guenter, > >> > >> > >> > >> Did you receive a response to my previous email? > >> > >> I would like to inquire if you have any further concerns regarding the PWM > >> and Tach with 16 instances. > > > > But isn't like this in all PWMs in all SoCs? > > > > Correct, pretty much every fan controller is implemented that way. > I don't understand the logic. > Hi Krzysztof and Guenter, Apologies for any confusion earlier. So, you think that the implementation with 16 instances of TACH/PWM device nodes in dts instead of one is ok to you, right? Thanks Best regards, Billy Tsai
