On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:39:57 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote: > > However for ABI breaks with scope limited to only one given platform, it > > is the platform's maintainer choice to allow or not allow ABI breaks. > > What we, Devicetree maintainers expect, is to mention and provide > > rationale for the ABI break in the commit msg. > > @Dinh: you should at least update the commit message to provide such > rationale, or possibly even better, drop this 2nd patch on next > submission. Or support both bindings, because the reset looks optional. So maybe instead of deleting the use of "stmmaceth-ocp", only go down that path if stpriv->plat->stmmac_ahb_rst is NULL?
