Re: [PATCH 2/7] crypto: stm32 - add new algorithms support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 9:58 AM Thomas BOURGOIN
<thomas.bourgoin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Did you run your test only with the patch adding the support for
> STM32MP13 or did you try the whole patch set ?

Both, actually.

> The error is on the test vector number 4, which is an HASH of 64 bytes
> which is exactly the size of a blcok for SHA1.
>
> Did you try to run the test for SHA256 ? (I guess you will see the same
> error on test vector 4)

Yes... I posted a log with both SHA256 and SHA1.

> I found a typo in the number of CSR to save/restore for the SHA1 and
> SHA256 algorithm. It should be 38 instead of 22.
> Tell me if it fixes the regression.

Yes this fixes the bug and the tests pass fine :)
I wonder why SHA1 was affected? Same codepath?

> It could be possible to divide the patch in 2 (one patch rework
> preparing MP13 and one patch with the new algorithm) but for the
> upstream I do not know if it is relevant to have 2 patches instead of one.

The major point of splitting patches to "one technical step" is to be
able to do fine-grained git bisect to find bugs such as this one :D
But admittedly the defintion of "techical step" is a bit fuzzy.

Yours,
Linus Walleij




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux