On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 19:58:27 +0200 , Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Grant, > > > On Dec 5, 2014, at 18:44 , Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > [snip] > > >> For instance, if the user issued a load request for a path in a container > >> which is the namespace under which the firmware file is located? Is it the > >> non-container filesystem, or is it under the container filesystem that > >> issued the request. The firmware layer does not have an API to discern. > > > > Wait, what? Why on earth would you want to expose this interface in a container? > > > > It was a complaint raised. > > Look at this thread. > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.documentation/27655 I've replied on that thread. I don't think the issues raised there warrent two completely separate methods for loading the data into the kernel. I want to see one method only. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
