Hi Arseniy,
avkrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 5 Jul 2023 11:03:30 +0300:
> On 05.07.2023 10:37, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Arseniy,
> >
> > AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 5 Jul 2023 09:54:33 +0300:
> >
> >> Meson NAND supports both 512B and 1024B ECC step size, so replace
> >> 'const' for only 1024B step size with enum for both sizes.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/amlogic,meson-nand.yaml | 4 +++-
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/amlogic,meson-nand.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/amlogic,meson-nand.yaml
> >> index 3bec8af91bbb..81ca8828731a 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/amlogic,meson-nand.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/amlogic,meson-nand.yaml
> >> @@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ patternProperties:
> >> const: hw
> >>
> >> nand-ecc-step-size:
> >> - const: 1024
> >> + enum: [512, 1024]
> >> + default: 1024
> >
> > I was actually wrong in my previous review, there is no strong default
> > here as the existing binding (and code) try to use the closest
> > parameters required by the NAND chip: we pick the "optimal"
> > configuration. So if you don't provide any value here, we expect
> > the strength and step size advertized by the chip to be used. This is a
> > common default in the raw NAND subsystem.
> >
> > Please drop the default line, re-integrate the missing R-by tag from
> > Rob and in a separate patch please mark nand-ecc-step-size and
> > nand-ecc-strength mandatory if the other is provide. IOW, we expect
> > either both, or none of them, but not a single one.
>
> I see, no problem! "mandatory" means update description of both fields like:
>
> description:
> Mandatory if nand-ecc-step-size is set.
Nope :-)
Something along:
allOf:
- if:
<nand-chip>:
properties:
contains:
- nand-ecc-step-size
then:
required:
<nand-chip>:
properties:
- nand-ecc-strength
And same with the opposite logic.
>
> etc.
>
> ?
>
> >
> >>
> >> nand-ecc-strength:
> >> enum: [8, 16, 24, 30, 40, 50, 60]
> >> @@ -93,6 +94,7 @@ examples:
> >> nand@0 {
> >> reg = <0>;
> >> nand-rb = <0>;
> >> + nand-ecc-step-size = <1024>;
> >
> > So in the end this line is wrong and once you get the description right
> > as I mentioned it above, this will fail to pass
> > `make DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ dt_binidng_check`
> > Please drop it from the example, don't add the second property here,
> > it's best to show a clean example where people stop tampering for no
> > reason with the optimal values.
>
> Ok!
>
> Thanks, Arseniy
>
> >
> >> };
> >> };
> >>
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Miquèl
Thanks,
Miquèl
