On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 03:21:30PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/07/2023 15:16, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 02:27:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> Also see: > >> "every Co-developed-by: must be immediately > >> followed by a Signed-off-by: of the associated co-author." > >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L467 > > Oh, that seems unhelpful especially with it not lining up with the DCO. > I assume the intention was here that if I attribute some co-author with > Co-developed-by, then I know that author, therefore I expect author to > explicitly participate in DCO chain. Why? They're not the one sending the patch out, nor are they relying on someone else having certified anything. > Otherwise, just drop the Co-developed-by. It seems separately useful.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
