On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 1:29 AM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxx>
>
> When filling hwcap the kernel already expects the isa string to start with
> rv32 if CONFIG_32BIT and rv64 if CONFIG_64BIT.
>
> So when recreating the runtime isa-string we can also just go the other way
> to get the correct starting point for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Delete the whole else & pull print_mmu() above it, since that's common
> code now
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 21 +++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> index a2fc952318e9..2fb5e8e1df52 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -253,13 +253,16 @@ static void print_isa_ext(struct seq_file *f)
> */
> static const char base_riscv_exts[13] = "imafdqcbkjpvh";
>
> -static void print_isa(struct seq_file *f, const char *isa)
> +static void print_isa(struct seq_file *f)
> {
> int i;
>
> seq_puts(f, "isa\t\t: ");
> - /* Print the rv[64/32] part */
> - seq_write(f, isa, 4);
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> + seq_write(f, "rv32", 4);
> + else
> + seq_write(f, "rv64", 4);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < sizeof(base_riscv_exts); i++) {
> if (__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, base_riscv_exts[i] - 'a'))
> /* Print only enabled the base ISA extensions */
> @@ -316,27 +319,21 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> unsigned long cpu_id = (unsigned long)v - 1;
> struct riscv_cpuinfo *ci = per_cpu_ptr(&riscv_cpuinfo, cpu_id);
> struct device_node *node;
> - const char *compat, *isa;
> + const char *compat;
>
> seq_printf(m, "processor\t: %lu\n", cpu_id);
> seq_printf(m, "hart\t\t: %lu\n", cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu_id));
> + print_isa(m);
> + print_mmu(m);
Did the indent get wonky here or am I just seeing it wrong because gmail?
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> if (acpi_disabled) {
> node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu_id, NULL);
> - if (!of_property_read_string(node, "riscv,isa", &isa))
> - print_isa(m, isa);
>
> - print_mmu(m);
> if (!of_property_read_string(node, "compatible", &compat) &&
> strcmp(compat, "riscv"))
> seq_printf(m, "uarch\t\t: %s\n", compat);
>
> of_node_put(node);
> - } else {
> - if (!acpi_get_riscv_isa(NULL, cpu_id, &isa))
> - print_isa(m, isa);
> -
> - print_mmu(m);
> }
>
> seq_printf(m, "mvendorid\t: 0x%lx\n", ci->mvendorid);
> --
> 2.40.1
>
