RE: [PATCH 2/2] arm: dts: imx6dl: correct cpufreq volt/freq table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi, Philipp
	The table you listed is VDDARM_IN and VDDSOC_IN which is for external PMIC and we normally do NOT adjust them when cpufreq change, we only adjust the internel LDO output, my table is for VDDARM_CAP and VDDSOC_CAP which are in the comment column, for LDO output.

For LDO enabled mode, VDDARM/SOC_CAP is the output of LDO, we pass this table to kernel opp.
For LDO bypassed mode, VDDARM/SOC_IN = VDDARM/SOC_CAP.
 
Best regards!
Anson Huang


-----Original Message-----
From: Philipp Zabel [mailto:p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 2014-12-05 5:39 PM
To: Huang Yongcai-B20788
Cc: shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: dts: imx6dl: correct cpufreq volt/freq table

Am Freitag, den 05.12.2014, 16:23 +0800 schrieb Anson Huang:
> Currently the cpufreq volt/freq table we used is for LDO enable mode, 
> according to latest datasheet Rev. 3, 03/2014, the volt/freq table is 
> as below:
> 
> LDO enabled(min value):
> 996MHz: VDDARM: 1.225V, VDDSOC: 1.150V;
> 792MHz: VDDARM: 1.150V, VDDSOC: 1.150V;
> 396MHz: VDDARM: 1.050V, VDDSOC: 1.150V;

>From which datasheet is this? I find it unlikely that the LDO enabled values are not larger than the LDO bypassed ones. I just had a look at the "i.MXSolo/6DualLite Automotive and Infotainment Applications Processors" Datasheet (IMX6SDLAEC) Rev. 3, 03/2014 and the "i.MX 6Solo/6DualLite Applications Processors for Consumer Products" Datasheet
(IMX6SDLCEC) Rev. 3, 03/2014, and they both have different values in Table 9 (Operating Ranges) for the LDO enabled case:

LDO enabled(min value):
996MHz: VDDARM: 1.350V, VDDSOC: 1.275V;
792MHz: VDDARM: 1.275V, VDDSOC: 1.275V;
396MHz: VDDARM: 1.175V, VDDSOC: 1.275V;

> LDO bypassed(min value):
> 996MHz: VDDARM: 1.250V, VDDSOC: 1.150V;
> 792MHz: VDDARM: 1.150V, VDDSOC: 1.150V;
> 396MHz: VDDARM: 1.050V, VDDSOC: 1.150V;
> 
> Adding 25mV to cover board IR drop, for LDO enabled mode of 996MHz, 
> VDDARM should be 1.250V, so this patch updates it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <b20788@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

regards
Philipp

��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux