Hello Rob, On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:05:08 -0600 Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, we do want dual license, but things converted from txt bindings > need those authors' permission as the txt bindings are all implicitly > GPLv2. That didn't happen here, so we kept the default implicit license. > Looks like this case is all Bootlin authors for significant parts of the > original txt binding, so you should be good on that part (assuming your > employer agrees). Maxime did the schema, so need his permission too. > > Note I have blanket permission on dual licensing from several companies > for DT files. It would be nice to get the same from Bootlin. I hereby allow the relicensing of all contributions from Bootlin employees on Device Tree binding documents in the Linux kernel from GPLv2 to GPLv2 or BSD-2-Clause. Let me know if this statement is sufficient or if you need anything more formal or specific. Best regards, Thomas Petazzoni -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com
