On Mon Jun 26, 2023 at 9:41 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 26/06/2023 08:38, Luca Weiss wrote: > >>>> but I guess no resends and it can be superseded. > >>> > >>> Right, the patches got reviews but was never applied... I really need to > >>> find a strategy to keep track of sent patches until they're applied with > >>> my work mailbox, it's not the first time that a patch has gotten > >>> forgotten. > >> > >> There was an error reported on the above series. Why would it be > >> applied? > > > > The error report at [0] complains about reg-names but I'm quite sure > > that patch 2/3 resolves this error. Does your bot only apply one patch > > at a time and run the check or apply all of them and then run it? It's > > been a while but I'm fairly sure I ran all of the checks before sending > > since I also documented some other patches in the cover letter there. > > You did it in cover letter, not in the patch, so there is no dependency > for bots recorded. I'm not aware how to put extra comments into a patch in a series with b4, at least last time I checked I don't think it was possible? But I also thought the cover letter was exactly there for giving some background of the series and documenting any dependencies on other patches. > > > > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/167241769341.1925758.17856681634949446114.robh@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Your patch 2/3 could not be applied to any tree. 3/3 applied but without > previous one caused warnings. Anyways, just resent the series as v4, maybe this time it can get picked up... Should have enough reviews by now :) Regards Luca > > > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
