On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:41:59AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 08:05:33PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 08:20:57AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > This adds rockchip,rk3588-dfi to the list of compatibles. Unlike ealier > > > SoCs the rk3588 has four interrupts (one for each channel) instead of > > > only one, so increase the number of allowed interrupts to four. > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230524083153.2046084-23-s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > It's unclear what the point of this link is. > > The link was added automatically by b4. I re-applied the series from the > last one I sent just to be sure that I base my work for the new series > on the one I sent last time. I didn't remember that b4 adds these links, > I should have disabled that option. Ah, I see. > > My comment still stands about whether only the new compatible should be > > permitted to have more than one interrupt. I don't recall a response to > > that question on the last version. > > My personal take on this is that such additions make the bindings more > readable by machines, but less by humans. That's why I don't have enough > intrinsic motivation to make this change. > Anyway, if you insist then I'll make it for the next round. No, I don't insist. I just wanted to not be ignored. Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
