On 16/06/2023 18:23, Jassi Brar wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 05:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 16/06/2023 05:58, jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Socionext's DeveloperBox is based on the SC2A11B SoC (Synquacer). >>> Specify bindings for the platform and boards based on that. >> >> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The >> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings. >> > I can remove it, but I see many mentions like "Fix bindings for" "Add > binding for" etc in the subject line. Can we fix them as well? > >> >> Binding without it's user is usually useless. Where is the user? >> > It is required for SystemReady-2.0 certification. For what? If there is no user, it is not required for SR. We don't document compatibles for something which does not exist in the projects. Best regards, Krzysztof
