On 6/15/23 15:20, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 11:20, Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For STM32MP25, we'll need to distinguish how is managed the delay block.
This is done through a new comptible dedicated for this SoC, as the
delay block registers are located in SYSCFG peripheral.
Signed-off-by: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
index 1c96da04f0e53..e47b3418b6c77 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
@@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ properties:
- const: st,stm32-sdmmc2
- const: arm,pl18x
- const: arm,primecell
+ - description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x for
+ STM32MP25. This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
What does this last sentence mean? Can we drop it?
Hi Ulf,
I just copied (and added "for STM32MP25") what was done for STM32MP1x:
- description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x.
This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
items:
- const: st,stm32-sdmmc2
- const: arm,pl18x
- const: arm,primecell
- description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x for
STM32MP25. This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
items:
- const: st,stm32mp25-sdmmc2
- const: arm,pl18x
- const: arm,primecell
Should I remove (or adapt) both descriptions?
Best regards,
Yann
+ items:
+ - const: st,stm32mp25-sdmmc2
+ - const: arm,pl18x
+ - const: arm,primecell
clocks:
description: One or two clocks, the "apb_pclk" and the "MCLK"
--
2.25.1
Kind regards
Uffe
