On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:50:17AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 03 December 2014 17:17:13 Lyra Zhang wrote: > > > 2014-11-27 2:29 GMT+08:00 Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@xxxxxx>: > > > How about sorting this includes? asm/irq.h go first followed linux/ in alphabatical order? > > > > There are a few compile warnings if I moved asm/irq.h to the top of > > all included files. > > The order that Murali meant is > > - first all linux/*.h headers, sorted alphabetically > - then all asm/*.h headers, again sorted alphabetically > > This is the recommended style in general. > > > Warning details are below: > > > > In file included from drivers/tty/serial/sprd_serial.c:14:0: > > ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h:6:39: warning: ‘struct pt_regs’ > > declared inside parameter list [enabled by default] > > extern void (*handle_arch_irq)(struct pt_regs *); > > ^ > > ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h:6:39: warning: its scope is only this > > definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want > > [enabled by default] > > ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h:8:54: warning: ‘struct pt_regs’ > > declared inside parameter list [enabled by default] > > extern void set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *)); > > > > I would consider this a (minor) bug in asm/irq.h. If you don't mind, > please submit a patch to add a line with 'struct pt_regs;' to > asm/irq.h. A better question is: why is a modern driver using asm/irq.h in the first place. We used to include that file when platforms defined IRQ numbers statically, but modern platforms don't do that, so it shouldn't be required anymore. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
