On Tue, 30 May 2023 09:15:21 +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > MSM8916 and MSM8939 are very similar and almost fully "pin-compatible", > so there are some devices that exist in very similar variants with both > MSM8916 and MSM8939. To allow sharing definitions for such devices the > SoCs should be set up as similar as possible, e.g. using the same > labels. At least for me this will also simplify maintenance and review > because board DTs do not behave and/or look subtly different. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Fix SD card detect pinctrl commit: dfbda20dabaa1f284abd550035db5887384c8e4c [2/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Consolidate SDC pinctrl commit: c943e4c58b2ffb0dcd497f8b12f284f5e8fc477e [3/6] arm64: dts: qcom: apq8016-sbc: Drop unneeded MCLK pinctrl commit: 6528e4a90b5105643fe4e748ae90e37dcb3a3502 [4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Cleanup audio pinctrl commit: 0d3a93b102829b22d104c4108ffc9d50f19a556d [5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename wcnss pinctrl commit: b40de51e3b6737a7bd41045e0cd3f78b75c35b24 [6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Drop msm8916-pins.dtsi commit: 8734d3355079152dc3fdf628a3724f55603c796d Best regards, -- Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>