On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 2:47 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 4:40 AM Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 1:35 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 11:28 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +Saravana
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:58:33PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > > > > The RISC-V APLIC interrupt controller driver is a regular platform
> > > > > driver so we need to ensure that it is probed as soon as possible.
> > > > > To achieve this, we mark the interrupt controller device nodes with
> > > > > FWNODE_FLAG_BEST_EFFORT (just like console DT node).
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 8f486cab263c ("driver core: fw_devlink: Allow firmware to mark devices as best effort")
> > > >
> > > > It is good practice to Cc the commit author of what you are fixing.
> > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/of/irq.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
> > > > > index 174900072c18..94e1d9245cff 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/of/irq.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
> > > > > @@ -535,6 +535,16 @@ void __init of_irq_init(const struct of_device_id *matches)
> > > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intc_desc_list);
> > > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intc_parent_list);
> > > > >
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * We need interrupt controller platform drivers to work as soon
> > > >
> > > > If it's platform drivers/devices you care about, then perhaps this
> > > > should be done when platform devices are created.
> > > >
> > > > > + * as possible so mark the interrupt controller device nodes with
> > > > > + * FWNODE_FLAG_BEST_EFFORT so that fw_delink knows not to delay
> > > > > + * the probe of the interrupt controller device for suppliers
> > > > > + * without drivers.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + for_each_node_with_property(np, "interrupt-controller")
> > > >
> > > > This function only operates on nodes matching 'matches', but this
> > > > operates on everything.
> > > >
> > > > It does make sense that if we init an interrupt controller here, then we
> > > > will surely want to probe its driver later on. So maybe just move
> > > > setting FWNODE_FLAG_BEST_EFFORT within
> > > > for_each_matching_node_and_match() below.
> > > >
> > > > > + np->fwnode.flags |= FWNODE_FLAG_BEST_EFFORT;
> > > > > +
> > >
> > > Definite Nack. You are pretty much disabling fw_devlink for all
> > > interrupt controllers. There are plenty of examples of the IRQ drivers
> > > being needed very early on and still probing properly without the need
> > > for this flag. Please fix your driver/DT.
> >
> > Okay, I will try to set FWNODE_FLAG_BEST_EFFORT only for
> > APLIC device_node via IRQCHIP_DECLARE().
>
> No, my point is that you very likely don't need to use that flag.
>
> What exactly is the problem you are facing? Point to an example RISC-V
> dts (not dtsi) in upstream and give specifics please.
The APLIC irqchip driver added by this series is a platform driver. It
used to work fine without setting FWNODE_FLAG_BEST_EFFORT
flag in fwnode but after commit 8f486cab263c the APLIC irqchip
driver did not probe hence this fix.
Regards,
Anup
