Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] NFC: nxp-nci: Add pad supply voltage pvdd-supply

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Krzysztof,

On Friday, June 9th, 2023 at 7:29 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > Why do you need these checks? This should be called in correct context,
> > > so when regulator is valid and enabled. If you have such checks it
> > > suggests that code is buggy and this is being called in wrong contexts.
> > 
> > First condition !IS_ERR(pvdd) is to check if pvdd exists.
> > Some devices, msm8916-samsung-serranove for example, doesn't need pvdd or
> > have it bound in the device tree:
> 
> 
> If regulator is missing you should get a dummy.
> 
> But anyway the code will not be executed if you don't get proper regulator.
> 

The current patch set is using devm_regulator_get_optional() instead of
devm_regulator_get(), which doesn't get a dummy regulator.

> > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/ab0f0987e035f908d670fed7d86efa6fac66c0bb
> > 
> > Without !IS_ERR(pvdd), checking it with regulator_is_enabled(pvdd):
> > 
> > [ 50.161882] 8<--- cut here ---
> > [ 50.161906] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffff9 when read
> > [ 50.161916] [fffffff9] *pgd=affff841, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000
> > [ 50.161938] Internal error: Oops: 27 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
> > 
> > Or disabling it directly with regulator_disable(pvdd):
> > 
> > [ 69.439827] 8<--- cut here ---
> > [ 69.439841] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000045 when read
> > [ 69.439852] [00000045] *pgd=00000000
> > [ 69.439864] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
> > 
> > Second condition regulator_is_enabled(pvdd) is to make sure that pvdd is
> > disabled with balance.
> 
> 
> So you have buggy code and to hide the bug you add checks? No, make the
> code correct so the check is not needed.
> 

Do you mean that I should use devm_regulator_get() instead in order to get
a dummy regulator, so that it can disable pvdd without unnecessary checks?
Actually there is v4 with those buggy codes and checks dropped.
Please do let me know if I am understanding and doing it correctly. I would
send it after proper period of cooldown.

Regards,
Raymond





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux