On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 08:03:44AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Nope, vendor prefixes don't go in node names. That's not explicit > anywhere, but goes against using generic node names. Yeah, that makes sense. > Also, note that looking at the DT spec, there's already prior art here > with PPC. See "power-isa-*". Though that appears in .dts files, but no > kernel code. Maybe you already saw that as your v1 is similar. There's > not really much advantage to align with it, but also not much reason > to deviate. I went back and forth on riscv-isa- versus riscv,isa-, picking the , for consistency with other properties in the file. I thought that doing it like power would be frowned upon & that it might've been done like that for historic reasons, especially given existing properties we have for riscv ISA related things are vendor properties w/ the comma. I don't have strong feelings either way though, so if you say s/,/-/ then that's good by me! Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
