On 02/12/14 13:55, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 02/12/14 13:27, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Add support to use gic as a parent for stacked irq domain. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> This change (which is now in -next as commit 9a1091ef0017c40a) breaks >>> booting on r8a7740/armadillo-legacy. >>> >>> It hangs because the timers cannot get their interrupts: >>> >>> console [tty0] enabled >>> sh-tmu.0: ch0: used for clock events >>> sh-tmu.0: ch0: used for periodic clock events >>> sh-tmu.0: ch0: failed to request irq 230 >>> sh-tmu.0: ch1: used as clock source >>> sh-cmt-48.1: ch0: failed to request irq 90 >>> sh-cmt-48.1: ch0: registration failed >>> earlytimer: unable to probe sh-cmt-48 early. >>> Calibrating delay loop... >> >> Grmbl... Are you, by any (lack of) chance, using a setup where the GIC >> is probed via DT, but the timers have their IRQs hardcoded? > > Yes, the GIC is declared in arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi: > > gic: interrupt-controller@c2800000 { > compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic"; > #interrupt-cells = <3>; > interrupt-controller; > reg = <0xc2800000 0x1000>, > <0xc2000000 0x1000>; > }; > > The timers come from legacy C board code in > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c: > > /* CMT */ > static struct sh_timer_config cmt1_platform_data = { > .channels_mask = 0x3f, > }; > > static struct resource cmt1_resources[] = { > DEFINE_RES_MEM(0xe6138000, 0x170), > DEFINE_RES_IRQ(gic_spi(58)), > }; Yup. This gic_spi() macro is completely doomed, as it computes a hardware interrupt where the kernel expects a virtual one. The only way to fix this is to init the GIC outside of DT, so that we stick to a legacy irqdomain. You can still use information from DT, but you can't rely on irqchip_init() to produce something that a legacy platform can use. > The corresponding r8a7740/armadillo-multiplatform works fine. OK, that's indeed the expected result. > Still, I'm wondering why sh73a0/kzm9g-legacy is not impacted by this > change... I'm a bit lost looking at the shmobile code. But I agree, kzm9g should die a painful death, as it has the same level of breakage as armadillo. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html