On 09.06.2023 15:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On 09/06/2023 14:09, Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>>> >>>>> interrupts? They are still required, so why no description here? >>>> >>>> It was here in the previous versions but Conor suggested to remove it as it >>>> was nothing specific about this description. For the if-then branch I kept >>>> it to specify that the interrupt is share with other devices. In this >>>> branch the interrupt is only for the timer itself. With this, would you >>>> still prefer to add it back? >>> >>> I just don't understand why interrupts are in one arm of the if: and not >>> in the other. >>> >> >> As previously mentioned, Conor suggested to have it like this. >> > > ok Would you still prefer to add back interrupt description on both branches of if? > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
